Aboveground storage tanks are the most common resources in the petroleum, paper production, and electricity sectors, and they form the backbone of facility operations.
However, operators may find it challenging to follow STI SP001 or API 653 recommendations due to the magnitude, scope, and complexity of inspections. Here, API inspection companies play a crucial role in maintaining the efficiency of the tank facilities.
The recent incorporation of robotic drones into NDT procedures, on the other hand, offers operators a complete inspection program utilizing the most up-to-date ultrasonic testing equipment. Compared to visual, handed, or drone inspection procedures, rapid ultrasonic gridding (RUG) and rapid automated ultrasonic testing (R-AUT) provide unrivaled safety, asset coverage, and data capture.
Facility operators place a high focus on safety. For inspection personnel, confined space entry (CSE) and high operations requiring structure and cables are all possible dangers. Using a drone to explore tank bottoms, fixed ceilings, and shells, on the other hand, minimizes the need to put people in danger while also saving money on scaffolding and other safety precautions.
Non-CSE inspections are becoming the industry standard, according to industry executives. Robots and drones for CSE, higher work, and commercial cleaning are one way to attain their aim.
When it comes to CSE circumstances like examining tank floors, robotic systems are ready to take on the challenge. Without the need for a person to enter the tank, robots fitted with up to 96 acoustic probes may gather thousands of data per ft2 to discover pits, oxidation, and normal wear on the floor.
Without an NDT approach that properly monitors the entire asset, understanding the overall state of AST may be difficult and time-consuming. Robots utilizing RUG or R-AUT, on the other hand, may cover vast regions in a relatively short time required by traditional approaches. Robots using RUG technology can go up to 60 feet per minute (18.3 meters per minute) and produce over 5,000 feet squared (467 square meters) every 12-hour shift. R-AUT inspections detect areas of concern at a manufacturing pace of up to 600 ft2 (56 m2) every shift. Robots can readily cover approximately 100 percent of assets in one or two stints at these speeds.
Robotic inspections yield 1,000 times more data than previous inspection methods and safety and coverage. Using software platforms, the data is frequently shown as 2D or 3D C-scan heat maps. Inspectors and managers can use the measurements and associated pictures to identify the AST’s oxidation process or other damage processes. This data may also be used to calculate corrosion rates using fitness-for-service estimates.
RUG works well for making deterioration patterns of tank shells and roofs. Each sensor may capture up to 250 readings per foot with as little as a quarter-inch sensor spacing. Then, using R-AUT, localized problem areas can be further evaluated. R-AUT generates tenfold more data than RUG – over 94,000 measurements per ft2 – to identify damage processes where it is most required.
Above all, and especially for above-ground holding tanks, robotic examinations and API inspection services can be employed to comply with industry standards like API 653. Qualified API 653 inspectors on staff at a full-service robotics firm will check the asset using robots and other techniques as needed, then prepare a complete report to meet inspection standards.
Aboveground storage tanks are controlled at the federal, state, and municipal levels to avoid oil spillage and other dangerous breaches and failures. Given the volume and sophistication of AST examinations, robots equipped with the most advanced UT technology provide a safe, dependable, and efficient replacement to traditional approaches. Furthermore, the data collected gives operators the confidence and capacity to comprehend tank wear trends and deterioration, allowing them to allocate funds for tank maintenance better.